Chapter 2 — The Double Bond: Ethylene

Two carbons, four hydrogens, one π bond. Classic chemistry adds a second orbital story on top of Chapter 1. C/T says: there are now two T-arrows at equilibrium — and twisting the bond is a diradical snap in slow motion.


The classic picture

Ethylene (C₂H₄) has a carbon–carbon double bond. The two carbons are sp²-hybridised: three sp² hybrids form the σ framework (C–C and C–H bonds), and the remaining unhybridised p orbitals on each carbon overlap sideways to form the π system:

  • π (bonding): p orbitals in phase, electrons delocalised above and below the plane
  • π* (antibonding): p orbitals out of phase, nodal plane between the carbons

At equilibrium (R_CC = 1.34 Å, planar geometry), both electrons go into π. The π bond order = 1, total C=C bond order = 2.

Quantity Value
C=C bond length 1.34 Å
C=C bond energy 720 kJ/mol (cf. 346 kJ/mol for C–C)
Rotation barrier ~65 kJ/mol (rotation about C–C breaks π bond)
Ground state geometry Planar (D₂h symmetry)

The rotation barrier is the classic signature of the π bond: rotating one CH₂ group by 90° costs energy because the p orbitals become orthogonal and the π bond breaks.


The C/T picture at equilibrium

At the planar equilibrium geometry, we ask for the NOONs of the π and π* orbitals. These come from a correlated (CASSCF) calculation in the (2e, 2o) active space:

Orbital NOON C/T classification
π (bonding) ~1.93 T-arrow (active)
π* (antibonding) ~0.07 T-arrow (active)

Both orbitals are T-arrows. Unlike H₂ at equilibrium (which was H⁰ with both orbitals as C-boxes), ethylene at equilibrium already has active character — it is even in its ground state.

This is the first qualitative difference between a single bond and a double bond: the π system carries intrinsic correlation that the σ system does not.

The active space is a point in Gr(1, 2) — the same Bloch sphere as H₂ — but the equilibrium point sits much further from the pole:

\[\theta_{\text{eq}} \approx 2\arcsin\!\sqrt{\frac{0.07}{2}} \approx 22°\]

Compare: for H₂ at equilibrium, θ_eq ≈ 8.2°. Ethylene starts deeper into H¹ territory.


Why π bonds have inherent T-arrow character

For the σ bond in H₂, the equilibrium NOONs are ~1.975 / ~0.025 — very close to 2 and 0. The σ orbital is almost exactly doubly occupied, and the Lewis diagram (two electrons in σ) is essentially exact.

For the π bond in ethylene, the equilibrium NOONs are ~1.93 / ~0.07. This is already outside the C-box range (NOON < 0.02 or > 1.98). Why?

The π bond is intrinsically weaker than the σ bond. The sideways overlap of p orbitals is smaller than the head-on overlap of sp² hybrids. Weaker overlap → smaller bonding/antibonding splitting → the antibonding orbital dips lower in energy and picks up more occupation in the correlated ground state.

In MaxEnt language: the Lagrange multipliers for π and π* are smaller in magnitude than for σ and σ*. The Gibbs weight is more evenly distributed between ππ⟩ and π*π*⟩ configurations. The two electrons are not quite as firmly committed to the bonding orbital.

This is the C/T explanation of why double bonds are harder to model with DFT than single bonds: the π system is H¹ at equilibrium, not H⁰.


The rotation barrier as a diradical snap

Now rotate one CH₂ group by angle φ about the C–C axis. What happens to the NOONs?

φ (°) n(π) n(π*) C/T tier Classic description
~1.93 ~0.07 Planar — π bond intact
30° ~1.80 ~0.20 π bond weakening
60° ~1.50 ~0.50 H¹/H² Strong correlation
90° ~1.00 ~1.00 Diradical — π bond broken

At φ = 90° (perpendicular geometry), the two p orbitals are exactly orthogonal. The π and π* orbitals are degenerate. Both NOONs → 1.00. The molecule is a diradical: two unpaired electrons, one on each carbon.

In C/T language: the perpendicular geometry is the diradical snap. The active-space point has reached the equator of the Bloch sphere (θ = 90°). This is exactly the same geometric event as H₂ near dissociation — the geodesic hits the Schubert variety.

The rotation barrier (≈65 kJ/mol) is the energy cost of this snap: you are paying to move the active-space point from θ ≈ 22° (planar, bonded) to θ = 90° (perpendicular, diradical).


Cis/trans isomerism

The same torsion picture handles cis and trans isomers. In 2-butene (CH₃–CH=CH–CH₃), the two methyl groups can sit on the same side (cis, φ = 0°) or opposite sides (trans, φ = 180°) of the double bond. Both are planar, both have n(π*) ≈ 0.07 — both are H¹ with identical NOONs.

C/T does not distinguish cis from trans from the electronic structure alone: they are the same point on the Bloch sphere. The distinction is purely geometric (nuclear configuration). What C/T does describe is the interconversion path: rotating from φ = 0° (cis) to φ = 180° (trans) requires passing through φ = 90° — the diradical snap. The thermal isomerisation barrier (~260 kJ/mol for simple alkenes) is the energy cost of that snap.

What about chirality? Enantiomers (R vs S, or Λ vs Δ) have identical NOONs and identical H^k tiers — the electronic structure is the same. However, the Berry phase of a closed loop traced in nuclear configuration space around a chiral centre has opposite sign for the two enantiomers. This is an H² (BIND) quantity: the holonomy of the active-space Berry connection distinguishes mirror images where the NOONs cannot. This is developed in Paper 594.


The Bloch sphere picture

For ethylene’s π system (2 electrons in 2 orbitals), the Grassmannian is again Gr(1, 2) ≅ S². The torsion angle φ parameterises a curve on S²:

\[\theta(\varphi) = 2\arcsin\!\sqrt{\frac{n_{\pi^\ast}(\varphi)}{2}}\]

The curve starts at θ ≈ 22° (planar) and rises monotonically to θ = 90° (perpendicular). Unlike H₂’s bond-stretching trajectory (which can return to the same point), the torsion trajectory is a one-way path from bonded to diradical.

The Berry phase of the full 0° → 90° → 0° rotation loop (twist and return) is non-zero — a concrete H¹ signature. The rotation barrier is not just an energy cost: it is the geometric price of a topological event.


Comparison: H₂ vs ethylene

Property H₂ (σ bond) Ethylene (π bond)
Equilibrium tier H⁰
Equilibrium NOON (antibonding) ~0.025 ~0.07
θ at equilibrium ~8.2° ~22°
Bond-breaking event Dissociation (stretch R) Torsion (rotate φ)
Snap geometry R ≈ 1.0–1.5 Å φ = 90° (exact)
Correlation at equilibrium None (HF exact) Moderate (CASSCF needed)
DFT reliability Excellent Good for energy; poor for diradical

The single bond is H⁰ at equilibrium. The double bond is H¹ at equilibrium. The C/T tier is a direct read of the bond type — no orbital diagram required.


The sceptic test

“My DFT calculation gives the right rotation barrier for ethylene. Why do I need C/T?”

For ethylene itself, DFT works. The problem appears in three places:

1. Twisted π systems in photochemistry. At φ = 90°, the ground state and first excited state are nearly degenerate (this is a conical intersection). DFT fails here — it is a single-reference method. The C/T method flags φ = 90° as H² (both NOONs ≈ 1) and tells you that CASSCF or MRCI is required.

2. Conjugated systems. In polyenes (butadiene, hexatriene, …), the π systems are coupled. The active space grows. C/T automatically selects the correct active orbitals from the NOONs — no expert judgement about which π bonds to include.

3. The rotation barrier decomposition. Classic chemistry says the barrier “comes from the π bond.” C/T quantifies this: the barrier is ∫ dθ along the geodesic on S², weighted by the Fubini-Study metric. This is not a new number — it is a geometric interpretation of a known number.


Numbers

Indicative values from CASSCF(2e, 2o)/STO-3G (ethylene):

Quantity Value
Equilibrium n(π) ≈ 1.93
Equilibrium n(π*) ≈ 0.07
θ at equilibrium ≈ 22°
n(π) at φ = 90° ≈ 1.00
n(π*) at φ = 90° ≈ 1.00
θ at φ = 90° 90° (exact by symmetry)
Rotation barrier (CASSCF) ≈ 65 kJ/mol

The φ = 90° values are exact by symmetry: the D₂ point group at perpendicular geometry forces π and π* to be degenerate.


In one sentence

Ethylene’s π bond is H¹ at equilibrium (both π and π* are T-arrows), and rotating the molecule to 90° is a diradical snap — the active-space point reaches the equator of the Bloch sphere, exactly as H₂ does near dissociation, but driven by geometry rather than distance.


Previous: Chapter 1 — The Single Bond: H₂
Next: Chapter 3 — Aromaticity: Benzene